Surgeon's preference of subcutaneous tissue resection: most important factor for short-term complications in subcutaneous implant placement after mastectomy-results of a cohort study.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the reason of high short-term complication rates after the subcutaneous placement of breast implants or expanders after mastectomy without biological matrices or synthetic meshes. This study aims to evaluate complications and their risk factors to develop guidelines for decreasing complication rates. METHODS: We included all cases of mastectomy followed by subcutaneous implant or expander placement between 06/2017 and 05/2018 (n = 92). Mean follow-up time was 12 months. RESULTS: Explantation occurred in 15 cases (16.3%). The surgeon's preference for moderate vs. radical subcutaneous tissue resection had a significant influence on explantation rates (p = 0.026), impaired wound healing or infection (requiring surgery) (p = 0.029, p = 0.003 respectively) and major complications (p = 0.018). Multivariate analysis revealed significant influence on complication rates for radical subcutaneous tissue resection (p up to 0.003), higher implant volume (p up to 0.023), higher drain volume during the last 24 h (p = 0.049), higher resection weight (p = 0.035) and incision type (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Based on the significant risk factors we suggest the following guidelines to decrease complication rates: favoring thicker skin envelopes after surgical preparation, using smaller implants, removing drains based on a low output volume during the last 24 h and no use of periareolar incision with extension medial or lateral. We should consider ADMs for subcutaneous one-stage reconstructions. The individual surgeon's preference of subcutaneous tissue resection is of highest relevance for short-term complications-this has to be part of internal team discussions and should be considered in future trials for comparable results.

Efficacy of intraoperative specimen radiography as margin assessment tool in breast conserving surgery.

PURPOSE: To explore the ability of intraoperative specimen radiography (SR) to correctly identify positive margins in patients receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS). To assess whether the reoperation rate can be reduced by using this method. METHODS: This retrospective study included 470 consecutive cases receiving BCS due to a primarily diagnosed breast cancer. SR was carried out in two planes, assessing the specimen regarding the presence of the lesion and its relation to all margins. If indicated, re-excision of selective orientations was advised. Under consideration of gross inspection and the SR-findings, it was up to the surgeon whether to perform re-resections. The recommendations for re-excision were, separately for each orientation, compared to the histopathological results, serving as gold standard. RESULTS: Intraoperative SR was performed in 470 cases, thus 2820 margins were assessed. Of those, 2510 (89.0%) were negative and 310 (11.0%) positive. SR identified 2179 (77.3%) margins correctly as negative, whereas 331 (11.7%) clear margins were misjudged as positive. Of 310 infiltrated margins, SR identified 114 (4.0%) correctly, whereas 196 (7.0%) infiltrated margins were missed. This resulted in a sensitivity/specificity of 36.8%/86.8% and PPV/NPV of 25.6%/91.8%. Through targeted re-resections positive margins could be reduced by 31.0% [310 to 214 (7.6%)]. On case level, the rate of secondary procedures could be reduced by 37.0% [from 162 to 102 (21.7%)]. CONCLUSIONS: SR is a helpful tool to identify infiltrated margins and to reduce the rate of secondary surgeries by recommending targeted re-excisions of according orientations in order to obtain a final negative margin status.

Disseminated Tumor Cells in the Bone Marrow of Patients with Operable Primary Breast Cancer: Prognostic Impact in Immunophenotypic Subgroups and Clinical Implication for Bisphosphonate Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in the bone marrow (BM) of primary breast cancer (BC) patients are a promising surrogate marker of micrometastatic spread and an independent predictor of poor prognosis for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The present study aims to analyze DTCs as an independent prognostic factor for DFS/OS in tumor biology and bisphosphonate treatment. METHODS: A total of 504 patients with operable primary BC and a median observation time of 72.3 months [lower quartile (LQ) 58.1; upper quartile (UQ) 82.8] have been included. DTCs were detected via immunohistochemistry as MUC-1 positive cells in the BM of 59.13 % (298 of 504) of the patients. The immunophenotyping of cancer cells was achieved immunohistochemically as well. RESULTS: For luminal A/B carcinoma patients, we observed a significant benefit of BM DTC negativity with respect to DFS (luminal A, P = 0.0498; luminal B, P = 0.0224). In triple-negative patients, DTC-negative BM was associated with a longer OS (P = 0.0326). In a multivariate Cox survival analysis relating to DFS and OS, the DTC status was identified as an independent prognostic factor for DFS in luminal A/B BC (P = 0.0071). A multivariate Cox survival analysis among DTC-positive patients with luminal immunophenotype showed bisphosphonate application (P = 0.0326) to be an independent prognostic factor for DFS. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our multivariate analyses reveal BM DTC positivity as an independent risk factor for DFS particularly in luminal A/B BC patients. This might be a novel criterion for the identification of candidates most likely to benefit from additional adjuvant therapy possibly including bisphosphonates.

Recall management of patients with Rofil Medical breast implants.

BACKGROUND: Some Rofil Medical breast implants are relabelled Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) implants, and it is recommended that Rofil implants be managed in the same way as PIP implants. We report the results of a systematic recall of patients who had received Rofil implants. METHOD: All patients who received Rofil implants at our centre were identified and invited for specialist consultation. In patients who opted for explantation, preoperative and intraoperative work-up was performed in accordance with national guidelines and analysed. In cases suspicious for rupture, an MRI scan was performed. RESULTS: Two-hundred and twenty-five patients (average age 56; range 28-80) received a total of 321 Rofil implants an average of 5.8 (range 1-11) years previously, 225/321 (70%) implants were used for reconstruction after breast cancer. A total of 43 implants were removed prior to 2011, mainly due to capsular contracture (CC). A total of 188 patients were still affected at the time of recall. Of the 188 patients, 115 (61%) attended for specialist consultation, of which 50 (44%) requested immediate implant removal. To date, 72 of 115 (63%) women attending consultation (38% of all affected) have chosen explantation, 66 of 72 (92%) opting for new implants. Of the 108 explanted implants, 25 (23%) had capsular rupture and 57 (53%) had implant bleeding. Preoperative clinical assessment was unreliable for predicting CC or rupture. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients attended for consultation and requested explantation. The quality of the explanted Rofil implants was comparable to PIP implants, with a higher rupture prevalence compared with other, non-affected implants. Nevertheless, the acceptance of breast implants for reimplantation remained high.

Long-term survival after adoptive bone marrow T cell therapy of advanced metastasized breast cancer: follow-up analysis of a clinical pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: The bone marrow (BM) of breast cancer patients harbors tumor-reactive memory T cells (TCs) with therapeutic potential. We recently described the immunologic effects of adoptive transfer of ex vivo restimulated tumor-reactive memory TCs from the BM of 12 metastasized breast cancer patients in a clinical phase-I study. In this trial, adoptive T cell transfer resulted in the occurrence of circulating tumor antigen-reactive type-1 TCs. We here describe the long-term clinical outcome and its correlation with tumor-specific cellular immune response in 16 metastasized breast cancer patients, including 12 included in the original study. METHODS: Sixteen metastatic breast cancer patients with preexisting tumor-reactive BM memory TCs were included into the study. The study protocol involved one transfusion of TCs which were reactivated in vitro with autologous dendritic cells pulsed with lysates of MCF-7 breast cancer cells as source of tumor antigens. The presence of tumor-reactive memory TCs was analyzed by IFN-γ ELISpot assays. RESULTS: Tumor-reactive memory TCs in the peripheral blood were induced de novo in 7/16 patients (44 %) after adoptive TC transfer. These patients were considered immunologic responders to the therapy. Positive adoptive immunotherapy (ADI) response was observed significantly more often in patients without bone metastases (p = 0.0051), in patients with high levels of tumor-reactive BM TCs prior to therapy (p = 0.036) and correlated significantly with the estimated numbers of transferred tumor-reactive TCs (p = 0.0021). After the treatment, we observed an overall median survival of 33.8 months in the total cohort with three patients alive at last follow-up and more than 7 years after ADI. Numbers of transferred tumor-reactive TCs correlated significantly with the overall survival of patients (p = 0.017). Patients with an immunologic response to ADI in the peripheral blood had a significantly longer median survival than nonresponders (median survival 58.6 vs. 13.6 months; p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: In metastasized breast cancer patients, adoptive transfer of BM TCs can induce the presence of tumor antigen-reactive type-1 TCs in the peripheral blood. Patients with immunologic response after ADI show a significantly longer overall survival. Patients with bone metastases significantly less frequently respond to the treatment and, therefore, might not be optimal candidates for ADI. Although the present study does not yet prove the therapeutic effect of ADI, these findings shed light on the relation between immune response and cancer prognosis and suggest that transfer of reactivated BM TCs might bear therapeutic potential.

Metronomic cyclophosphamide treatment in metastasized breast cancer patients: immunological effects and clinical outcome.

Severe immune suppression is frequent in late-stage tumor patients and promotes tumor immune evasion and subsequent tumor progression. Regulatory T cells (Treg) are major suppressors of anti-tumor immune responses. Therefore, targeting of Treg has become a key goal of anti-tumor therapy. Several preclinical and clinical observations suggest that Treg can be depleted by cyclophosphamide. Over a period of 3 months, we investigated the effect of metronomic low-dose cyclophosphamide on Treg numbers, suppressive capacity and proliferation on endogenous anti-tumor T-cell responses and on their correlation to clinical outcome in 12 patients with treatment-refractory metastasized breast cancer who received single-agent 50 mg cyclophosphamide p.o. daily. Cyclophosphamide treatment initially caused a significant reduction in circulating Treg by more than 40% (P = 0.002). However, Treg numbers completely recovered during the treatment due to increased proliferative activity and maintained their suppressive capacity. Treg depletion coincided with a strong increase in breast tumor-reactive T cells (P = 0.03) that remained at high levels during the whole period. Numbers of tumor-reactive T cells but not of Treg correlated with disease stabilization (P = 0.03) and overall survival (P = 0.027). We conclude that metronomic low-dose cyclophosphamide only transiently reduces Treg but induces stable tumor-specific T-cell responses, which correlate with improved clinical outcome in advanced-stage breast cancer patients.

Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation.

We analysed intra- and inter-rater agreement of subjective third party assessment and agreement with a semi-automated objective software evaluation tool (BCCT.core). We presented standardized photographs of 50 patients, taken shortly and one year after surgery to a panel of five breast surgeons, six breast nurses, seven members of a breast cancer support group, five medical and seven non-medical students. In two turns they rated aesthetic outcome on a four point scale. Moreover the same photographs were evaluated by the BCCT.core software. Intra-rater agreement in the panel members was moderate to substantial (k = 0.4-0.5; wk = 0.6-0.7; according to different subgroups and times of assessment). In contrast inter-rater agreement was only slight to fair (mk = 0.1-0.3). Agreement between the panel participants and the software was fair (wk = 0.24-0.45). Subjective third party assessment only fairly agree with objective BCCT.core evaluation just as third party participants do not agree well among each other.

Do reexcisions impair aesthetic outcome in breast conservation surgery? Exploratory analysis of a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Reexcision is a clinically relevant aspect of oncological breast conservation surgery. The influence of reexcision on aesthetic outcome is described differently in the literature. Our aim was to analyze this question in a well-defined cohort with standardized study instruments. METHODS: A total of 439 patients from a prospectively followed cohort were included in this analysis. Aesthetic results were assessed by the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) aesthetic status. Dates of assessments were shortly after surgical interventions and before surgery. Group comparison was performed between patients with reexcisions (80 cases; 18%) and patients without reexcision (359 cases; 82%). We considered variables of differing distribution between the two groups that could hypothetically influence BCTOS aesthetic status in a nonparametric analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). RESULTS: The aesthetic status of patients with reexcisions was found to be significantly worse than for patients with a single breast conservation surgery (P < 0.0001) when tested by a nonparametric ANCOVA model. Because patients with reexcisions had more noninvasive tumors (25% vs. 8%, P = 0.0001) and tumors were larger in patients with reexcision (P = 0.01), we included these variables as possible covariates in the multivariate model. The model was adjusted for the BCTOS aesthetic status before and shortly after the first surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that reexcision in breast conservation surgery impairs aesthetic outcome, at least when assessed shortly after surgery.